House on the Corner (23 June 1957-58)

 An early Australian television program which aired from 1957 to 1958. A 10-minute segment on Sydney station ATN-7, it was a drama about a family, and was produced by the Christian Television Association. 

Cast included Harry Howlett (who also wrote it), his wife also played a role, as well as Rosemary Barker and Annette Andre.

The series aired live, with the cast consisting mainly of amateurs drawn from church drama clubs.  

It was probably the first attempt at a dramatic TV series produced for Australian television, though not the first dramatic TV series produced in that country (overseas-financed children's series The Adventures of Long John Silver was the first in that regard, and pre-dated the introduction of television to Australia) Australian TV drama was relatively rare at the time.

Background

A condition of a commercial television station's licence was that it had to make available free pro-rate air time to the Christian religious dominations; ATN-7 had an allocated quarter hour on Sunday afternoon. The manager of ATN-7 in Sydney, Len Mauger, allowed Harry Howlett, a former actor and then executive for an association of Protestant churches, to use that quarter hour for a drama series. It was called The House on the Corner and was given the nickname The Brothel on the Bend.

It was directed by David Cahill. According to Ailsa McPherson, who worked on the show as a script assistant, "it had a script with a social message and some highly dramatic scenes, with settings created by scavenging among the stock flats and properties available at ATN." She said the actors would come into Seven's studio on Sunday afternoon and there was a camera rehearsal before transmission.

Annette Andre recalled:

The first thing I did on television was this religious program [The House on the Corner (1957) a drama produced by the Christian Television Association which aired on ATN-7] – a quarter hour show. I think it was 4 eps in total, and I was in the four.

I played a young Hungarian girl, and I didn’t know any Hungarians. I went around the shops and eventually found one girl serving behind a counter who was Hungarian. I got into conversation with her and explained that I had to acquire a Hungarian accent. She was very helpful and spent some time talking with me. The director was quite happy with the accent – but I really don’t think he knew what a Hungarian accent sounded like either. 

It was announced in May 1957. I'm not sure it started until July though.

It was meant to be replaced by a show The Star of David in January 1958 but I'm not sure the latter was ever released.

 Episodes

23 June 1957, 14 July 1957, 21 July 1957, 28 July 1957, 11 Aug 1957, 18 Aug 1957, 25 Aug 1957, 8  Sept 1957, 15 Sept 1957, 22 Sept 1957, 6 Oct 1957, 13 Oct 1957, 20 Oct 1957, 10 Nov 1957, 17 Nov 1957, 1 Dec 1957, 8 Dec 1957, 15 Dec 1957, 29 Dec 1957, 5 Jan 1958, 12 Jan 1958,

 

SMH 15 May 1957

SMH 2 Nov 1957

 
Ailsa McPherson

SMH 16 Dec 1957

AWW 5 Jun 1957

SMH 20 Jan 1958

General Motors Hour - general articles

 Brian Wright told Susan Lever:

Then we went to the “General Motors Hour.” We did 2-3 Australian plays. We bought Sumner Locke Elliot’s “Shadow of...” “The Grey Nurse Said Nothing” and Bruce Stuart’s “Shadow of a Pale Horse.” We did those at the “General Motors Hour.” They were plays which had been done overseas. But the other two we were talking about, we actually commissioned here.   I had a dream just before I left Channel 7. Of coming up with a whole new series of Australian plays. I left Channel 7 at that stage, and that never came to pass.




Ailsa McPherson

And ad man, R Walker, talked about the show in the Vincent Committee

Would you care to mention to the Committee the matter of whether there is a buyer resistance to locally produced programmes?
—Guardedly I would answer that the buyer resistance is there in relation to the past performance of Australian programmes. In other words, by and large they have not achieved the ratings, that is, the high audience exposure, that overseas programmes have achieved. In some instances that is a calculated risk. For instance, our clients General Motors sponsored last year six Australian plays. In putting them we knew that we could not possibly attract the same sort of audience as if we had put on an hour Hollywood film or something like that, but by and large we thought we would get to an articulate opinion forming group of the community, and, as such, they are more important to us than the mere physical numbers. So I would say that any resistance there is is probably brought about by the relatively poor performance of Australian programmes to date.
Could you express a view with regard to the standards of local drama as distinct from overseas drama shown in Australia?
—They certainly lack the slickness of the American productions.
What do you mean by “ slickness ”?
—Professional techniques that they adopt in both the camera movement and in casting. For instance, by and large even the most horrible of till the violent gun-slinging things is usually perfectly ‘ cast and there is an overall air of perfect production. That is sometimes lacking in the Australian programmes.
We have had evidence to-day that some of that is due to a lack of rehearsing time because of a lack of financial 1 resources?
—That could be with some of them, I guess, 1 but I think the normal General Motors Hour, for instance, \ which lasts anything from one hour to one-and-a-half hours would take from 40 to 45 hours rehearsal time, ‘= as opposed to the old radio days of probably eight hours 1 rehearsal time. The rehearsals that we have in Australia c are not equivalent to those that are carried out in America, F of course, where a one-hour play is rehearsed throughout a a whole week. However, the rehearsals here may be spread f over a week, although actually held on only two or three v afternoons. p
Would you say that buyer resistance is changing?
—I F* Jo not like the word “ resistance ”. ° It has been used by the Broadcasting Control Board, ^ but you can use your own expression. You know what I mean, do you not?
—I know what you mean, hut I do not n, think die word is appropriate to describe the attitude of advertisers. Cadburys and most of our clients would be very happy to put on Australian programmes, providing tc we had a reasonable assurance of fa) their quality, and b. (h) that they would get to a reasonable cross-section of oi the market. Where you are selling dav-lo-day products w like dairy-milk chocolate or nut-milk chocolate, your se approach is a little bit different from that which you use of when selling the value of General Motors to the Australian th economy. When you have consumer products with their vvi volume turnover you are looking for the greatest possible audience exposure to your advertising. I think, in passing, that it is fair to point out that television is only one of the many media open to advertisers to sell their wares ar and there is no responsibility on the part of any advertiser ag to use television at all. We use it because it suits our book sei to do so, but there is no inherent obligation. sb Would you say the standard of locallv produced drama °f is improving?
--Yes, I definitely would. We put on a couple of shows. “One Day of the Year” being one of them, and the other “Man Haul”, by Osmar White, and thj while some of the tail-end actors were rather weak, the by main acting was very’ good. j \ MR. R. R. WALKER
And are suitable local productions as freely available as overseas productions?
—They are very difficult to get.
Is that because of poor quality or insufficient quantity?
—• Because of lack of quality. There is no lack of quantity.
You sa’v there is no lack of quantity?
—I do not think so. General Motors ran a General Motors Theatre Award through the Elizabethan Trust in Sydney. Last year it was run in connexion with plays; this year it is run in con- nexion with a musical comedy. The awards have just recently been made. I think that of about 260 plays we received, about four or five looked possibilities for television productions, but after reading them we found that they posed too man’y production difficulties. So that out of 260 we got virtually none. We are inclined to think now that it is better to commission writers to write plays, writers of known stature, than to invite people to sub- mit plays by way of competitions.
Are you suggesting that we have not the dramatists in Australia?
—Yes, I would suggest that.
By Senator Hannan.—Would you agree that the qualified script writer is probably the greatest bottleneck in the production of good quality local programmes?
—Yes.
In other words, the scriptwriter is in fact the key man?
—Yes. 

You said also in speaking of the approach of the igencies to local productions, that generally they would ae happy to have the local product if it was reasonably >ood and could be widely shown. Are those the two con- ditions?
—Reasonably good and widely shown, and with a ■easonable assurance that it would be well received. ..

 I can tell you what we paid for the General Motors Hour pro- grammes, “ One Day of the Year ” and “ Man Hall ”, They cost us between £3,000 and £3,500 per programme. That does not include station time. I might add that the stations have said that on that figure they lost money, but to what extent 1 do not know. 

It was actually produced by the programme department of the transmitting station?

—In association with the Eliza- bethan Theatre Trust...

What does it cost to buy prime time, between 7.30 and 9.30 p.m., in Sydney and Melbourne?
—I will give you the half-hour rates. This is based on once a week, 52 half hours a year, and these are averages. In Melbourne about £270, Sydney £310, Brisbane and Adelaide £130.
And it is about £600 an hour, which is about £10 a minute, for television time?
—About £600 an hour. If you wanted to sponsor a half-hour programme It would cost you between £550 and £600 for an average good quality American product.    

Age 11 May 1961


Autumn Affair (20 Oct 1958-20 Oct 1959)

 The first daytime serial on Australian TV.

Started in Melbourne on GTV-9 on 2 Feb 1959 see here

Production

Brian Wright told Susan Lever:

We were trying to flog, at the time we were trying to flog, a big variety show to David Jones. And retailers had not sponsored anything on television at that time. They didn’t think television would ever be any use to them. But we were trying to sell this show to David Jones. As Production Manager, I was there with Len Major, the Station Manager. I’d hauled along Richard Lane, the writer, and one of the founders of the Writer’s Guild. Dick I’d known from radio days. And Dick was to write the new variety show for David Jones.

    Well, the meeting flopped. They refused to accept the show. The three of us were standing outside in the rain on Elizabeth Street outside David Jones. I don’t know who came up with it first. We were throwing around what we needed to do. I remember somebody started to say, “You know in radio, the daytime soapy was so big in radio. The stations used to run one after the other. And those of us who worked in it, made our living from them. So why shouldn’t we do a soap on television?” We started to throw it around. “It wouldn’t cost that much money!”

    So I remember turning to Dick and said, “What about you, Dick? Would you like to write one?” And Dick would certainly like to write one. So we shot off Dick to write one, and I was put to the job of sort of planning the production. I think I had a few hundred pounds for the above the line cost as my budget per episode, and we came up with Autumn Affair, with Muriel Steinbeck playing the lead.

    And we did three episodes a week. I remember writing a letter, a memo, to the Board of Directors, asking for the money. Saying: “I can’t guarantee that this will be good. It will probably be very bad. The script writer knows nothing about television. The director knows a little bit about television. I know very little about television. But if we don’t start doing it, we’ll never learn, so this will be worthwhile as a learning project, but I cannot promise you any return on it.” And they gave me the money, not very much, a few hundred pounds. We kicked off and we ran for a year with three episodes a week. And actually, they made a little bit of profit! Dick told me some years later--well, quite a few years later after - I had managed to write a contract giving him residuals for his scripts. I was a writer myself, and I thought this should be done. Dick said that eventually after a few years they came to him and said, “Could we buy you out of your residuals?” They bought him out. And he managed to carpet his flat with the money he was bought out for. But that was Autumn Affair that started it all off. ..

It was a radio script with pictures. And, you know, we were all learning. I think we started with one set, and I think as we went on, we managed to get two sets. No film exteriors, or anything like that. .. We had very little money. Our management, the business side of our management, couldn’t really get the concept of drama. All they could see was this costs a great deal of money. And it’s much cheaper to do variety shows of various kinds. They didn’t think the audience would take it.



Ratings

Melbourne ratings appear to have been strong. An average rating of 13! It played in the aafternoons there.

It ended in Syd on 20 Oct 1959. It was replaced by The Story of Peter Grey

Went in Melbourne until 27 Jan 1960.

Ratings 










SMH 19 Jan 1959

Sept 1958

SMH 4 Oct 1958

SMH 6 Oct 1958

SMH 20 Oct 1958

SMH 20 Oct 1958

SMH 21 Oct 1958

SMH 21 Oct 1958


SMH 5 Jan 1959

The Age 8 Jan 1959

SMH 2 Dec 1958

SMH 21 Feb 1959

SMH 1 June 1959

SMH 11 Oct 1959

SMH 30 Oct 1960

Fairfax

Faifax
















The Sin Shifter (16 September 1962)